Certificate of Relationship Health Bureau of Relationships
Flat-lay of two mismatched mugs on saucers, a folded plaid blanket, a strip of ticket stubs, a tangle of fairy lights, a small potted plant, a blank index card, a star-stamped wax seal, and a photo of two chairs pulled close together at a table, arranged with washi tape and doodled hearts and question marks.

Certificate of Relationship Health

to be completed in your own hand

Processing time: 6 min Items: 24

No sign-up. Issued the same day.

This certificate is issued from a 24-item self-report test built around six everyday aspects of how a relationship functions, the same kind of self-report approach researchers use to track relationship satisfaction over time. Read each item, answer for the relationship actually underway, and a classification of how it’s currently holding up, with the supporting record behind it, is ready to view in about 6 minutes.

Share This Test

0%
How satisfied do you feel with your relationship as a whole these days?
Situation: a disagreement starts. How does it usually go from there?
How much do you find yourself doubting your partner will really come through?
Do you and your partner actually agree on most everyday, day-to-day matters?
Describe how much of an ordinary week you and your partner spend really connecting.
Do your goals and your partner's goals point in roughly the same direction?
How often does the thought cross your mind that this relationship just isn't good?
Once an argument ends, how long before things actually feel normal again?
Day to day, how predictable does your partner's behavior feel to you?
When a routine decision comes up, does it get worked out together?
How often do you and your partner end up together without really connecting?
Deep down, how confident do you feel about this relationship's future?
Compared with what you hoped for going in, how does this relationship hold up?
When something's bothering you, does it actually reach your partner, or stay with you?
How comfortable do you feel confiding something personal in your partner?
When your habits and your partner's clash, what tends to happen next?
Right now, how emotionally close do you feel to your partner?
How often do you find yourself thinking about life without this relationship?
On an ordinary, unremarkable day, how content do you feel in this relationship?
Before raising something difficult with your partner, how safe does that feel?
Around your partner, how much of yourself do you find yourself holding back?
Does the bigger picture of where life is headed feel aligned between you two?
How much affection do you feel you actually receive from your partner?
How much weight does the life you two have built together carry for you?

The certificate will be issued in this name. Leave it blank to issue it to the bearer.

About This Certificate

How the bearer's current, specific romantic relationship is functioning day to day — across satisfaction, how conflict gets handled, trust, everyday coordination, closeness, and commitment.

Test author Editorial Staff

Rate This Certificate
5.0/5

Attachments

Attachment 1. Methodology

Behind this test sits one simple design choice: add together how present six distinct, everyday sides of a relationship currently are — satisfaction, how disagreements unfold, whether trust holds, how smoothly daily life gets coordinated, how much shared time and affection show up, and how confident the future feels — into one combined reading. What gets scored is this one bearer's own current relationship, exactly as it stands right now, not a category of person and not a general way of relating; the partner's character is never part of what gets read here, only what the bearer has personally noticed and chooses to report.

This test is built from twenty-four statements, all first-person, spread four to each of those six areas, and every one sits on the same five-step ladder, from barely present to close to constant. A quarter of the statements are written backwards on purpose, so agreeing with them pulls the total down rather than up, a built-in check against simply nodding along throughout. The five results aren't sliced into equal fifths of that range: each boundary falls where the total's own meaning shifts from one kind of pattern to another, and the lowest band is deliberately the narrowest of the five, since sustained relationship strain shows up in the research as a genuine minority pattern rather than an even split of the population.

This reading rests entirely on self-report: it captures what one person is able to notice and willing to put into words about their own day-to-day experience. Only the bearer's side ever gets asked here — the partner never fills out a single item, and no result passes judgment on them. Two bearers can land on the identical overall figure by entirely different routes: solid in three of the six sides and shaky in the other three, or the mirror image of that, since one combined number was never built to show which parts carried the weight. This test stays inside the ordinary, non-clinical range of how a relationship works: it does not ask about, and cannot detect, coercive control, threats, or physical safety, and a reader with any concern along those lines is better served by dedicated resources than by anything in this result. For background on how a couple's own conflict style shapes things over time, see the American Psychological Association; for general guidance on maintaining a relationship and where to turn if something feels wrong, see the NHS.

This is not a diagnostic instrument.

Attachment 2. Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my relationship is healthy?

There isn't one clear sign to check for. What this test does is take the bearer's own account of six well-studied sides of everyday relationship functioning and turn it into a single reading — a level along that scale, not a thumbs-up-or-down verdict, closer to describing how things feel right now than diagnosing what the relationship is.

Are relationship quizzes like this one actually accurate?

This test borrows its underlying approach from methods researchers already use to study how relationships hold up, though what it produces is a personal check-in, not anything clinically validated or built to forecast outcomes. There's no percentage to offer as a stand-in for accuracy, though weighing one's own answers against what others report is perfectly fair.

Does a low result mean I should end the relationship?

It doesn't. Each level is a snapshot of how things stand for the bearer right now, not a nudge in either direction about what should happen next. Basing a decision that size on one quiz would be asking more of it than it can deliver — deciding whether to stay isn't something any test here is set up to do.

Is this a relationship style or personality quiz?

No — this one only tracks how one specific, current relationship is doing from day to day; it doesn't sort anyone into a personality type or hand out a relating-style label. Readers hunting for that kind of label are after something this particular test isn't built to produce.

How many questions does this relationship test have?

Twenty-four items in total, four for each of the six areas this test tracks. Whether another quiz somewhere runs longer or shorter says nothing about which one lands closer to the truth — question count mostly just reflects how many areas a given test decided to cover, not how sharp its results are.

Attachment 3. References
  1. Hlynsson, J. I., Ívarsson, Í. Ö., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2025). To be or not to be satisfied in your romantic relationship: Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Valentine scale. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.
  2. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112.
  3. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28.
  4. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.